The Reviews Are In: Canon 40D a Hit


One of the first visual tip-offs that indicate if a reviewer likes a camera is how the list of "pros" stacks up against the "cons." Two recent in-depth reviews of the Canon EOS 40D were published -- by Imaging Resource and by DP Review, and the pros and cons list were more lopsided than the first game of the World Series (Boston Red Sox 13, Colorado Rockies 1). DP Review's cons list, as short as it was, still seemed to be a stretch to find anything negative.

In his conclusion, Phil Askey sums up: "When I first started using the EOS 40D a simple description came to mind: that this is a 'well sorted camera'. It feels well rounded - the result of years of evolutionary improvement, it delivers in almost every area, and it inspires confidence. From a usability point of view the viewfinder feels larger, ergonomics are good, the user interface is clear and easy to learn, there are no in-use performance issues, metering and auto-focus show good consistency and the results speak for themselves; colorful (yet accurate) detailed images with low noise even at high sensitivities." (From DP Review).

Imaging Resource echos this sentiment: "The new Canon 40D offers a very mature set of features in a camera that's priced lower than its predecessors. It also offers as much value and image quality as competing designs that are hundreds of dollars more. Canon's pro SLR designs have always been conservative, and they didn't try to leap-frog the market with a higher resolution sensor; instead they stuck to a 10-megapixel sensor size that would deliver the quality that Canon fans are used to," says Shawn Barnett, Dave Etchells, and Siegfried Weidelich of Imaging Resource.

These days, when I think DSLR, I want a camera that produces outstanding "photographic" images, that is durable, and is a pleasure to use. The Canon 40D fits that bill nicely. Yes, the reviews are in, and the the 40D is a hit.

Technorati Tags: , ,


I'm really enjoying mine... the images are really good, and the three custom modes on the dial are fabulous. Now if only Apple would support it in Aperture! :)

I'm quite happy to see that both Canon and Nikon have stopped playing the game of "we must increase the sensor density for marketing's sake, even if it means lower quality pictures". Or, at least they've stopped doing it in their dSLR lineups anyway.

The 40D will be supported in Aperture soon. My impression is that Apple is a little stretched engineering-wise right now because of the Leopard launch and the iPhone SDK project.

Some have said the image quality of the 40D is comparable to to 5D.
( )

Aside from another couple of megs of pixels, what does the extra $900 buy me with the 5D?

To comment on my comment :)

If guess what I am wondering is that with such performance and additional features of the 40D, is the 5D due for an 'update'?

For example the 5D does not have self cleaning; wireless connectivity of its 1D siblings but its niece 40D has. In particular the DIGIC III seems to be doing some real magic with the those 10 M pixels with a 1.6x conversion factor (non full frame) iff the claim of image quality are true.

It also seems that Canon should have made the 5D water and dust resistant as it does its bigger siblings since it is a Pro model.

Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!

This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I enjoy seeing websites that understand the value of providing a prime resource for free. I truly loved reading your post. Thanks!